Regulations Case Study
Hello, today, or I should say this week I was assigned to do a case study about regulation in the way that films are regulated based on how big they are based on their production. This is usually break into two part which is a biblical reference which is David and Goliath. David being the small film company and Goliath being the huge conglomerate with a lot of money and influence. I choose one film for each category for my Goliath I went with the film "Spiderman No Way Home" and for My David I went with and old film from 1999 called the "The Blair Witch Project".
The film I choose to represent my Goliath was Spiderman No Way Home. This film was given a rating of PG-13 and the rating was given by Motion Picture Association or also known as the MPA. Since Spiderman No Way Home is my Goliath its is own by huge conglomerate in this case the film right is own by Sony.
Mostly What I found about how this film is regulated is that since it was a superhero movie it was given a rating of PG-13 because of its sequences of action/violence, some language and brief suggestive comments. The film did face some controversy when it was being released and regulated which led it to be ban in China due to distributor Sony Pictures refused demands by Chinese authorities to censor the film's depiction of the Statue of Liberty. Therefore the film was never release in China.
Also since the film from the conglomerate it means it was mostly made for the simple reason of profits. The film grossed nearly $1.9 billion worldwide, making it the highest-grossing film of 2021 and the sixth-highest-grossing film of all time at the time of its release which mean it intention was fulfilling.
The film I choose to represent my David was The Blair Witch Project from 1999. This film was given a rating of R, and the rating was given by the Motion Picture Association (MPA), specifically its Classification & Ratings Administration (CARA) division.
Mostly what I found about how this film is regulated is that it was given an R rating primarily for language. The film's use of intense psychological terror and "frightening and intense scenes" contributed to its mature classification, but the official MPA reason was the profanity. The film did face some controversy regarding regulation, but not in the form of an international ban. Instead, the main controversy was surrounding the marketing and the treatment of the actors. Artisan Entertainment ran a groundbreaking viral marketing campaign, heavily utilizing the early internet since it made look that the actor were actually dead
Also the film grossed nearly $250 million worldwide, making it one of the most successful independent films of all time based on the ratio of cost to revenue. This meant its intention of fulfilling massive profits was more than successful, setting a Guinness World Record for the "Top Budget: Box Office Ratio"
In conclusion The regulation of films like Spider-Man: No Way Home (Goliath) and The Blair Witch Project (David) reveals that while both are rated by the MPA, the type of regulation and controversy varies significantly with production scale. Spider-Man faced high-stakes international censorship demands (China ban) due to its massive global market reliance. Blair Witch, an independent film, had a straightforward R rating but generated controversy through a viral, ethically ambiguous marketing campaign that utilized regulatory gaps in early internet advertising.
The primary lesson is that film regulation is tied directly to business strategy. Conglomerates like Sony navigate complex geopolitical regulations to protect massive revenues, often aiming for broad appeal (PG-13). Independent films, with lower budgets, have more flexibility in content (R rating) and can use marketing controversy as a powerful, low-cost tool for profitability. Ultimately, managing regulation and controversy is a core component of a film's financial success, regardless of its size.